Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN) is
everywhere. By disrupting the way people shop, Amazon has
created economic ripple effects that go far beyond the
customer’s wallet to directly and indirectly impact economic
activity, whether that impact is inflation, jobs or investment.
The Wallet Opener
Amazon started with books and then added pretty much everything
you can think of, from engagement rings to coffins, for sale on
their site. Add the convenience of having it delivered promptly
to your doorstep, and customers have rewarded Amazon with open
wallets, so much so that North American electronics and general
merchandise sales for the company have grown from a mere 2% of
total general merchandise retail sales (GAFO) in 2006 to more than 60% in 2016. Similarly
over the past 10 years, this category of Amazon sales has
increased from a little over 7% of e-commerce retail sales to
more than 66%. And the growth is accelerating. Last year alone,
this segment saw a 28% jump in sales compared to 2015.
If you consider a more macro picture, consumers spending more
is a good sign because it contributes to the GDP. Having said
that, in no way is consumer spending on Amazon significant
enough yet to tip the GDP scale. But it could be in future.
The Inflation Killer
Amazon has disrupted traditional retail and accelerated the demise of
struggling players. Without storefronts the company’s
overhead costs are significantly lower than other retailers
giving them an edge to undercut on prices and operate on wafer
thin profit margins.
That makes some economy watchers nervous about Amazon’s
deflationary impact. Ideally, low unemployment is accompanied
by wage growth, which in turn fuels inflation as companies pass
on the cost to consumers. This is the logic of the Phillip’s Curve, but Amazon
has disrupted that as well.
Higher competition and lower prices limit the companies’
ability to pass on any wage increases to consumers. Those
worries were recently echoed in the wake of the Whole Foods
acquisition where remarks by Chicago Federal Reserve President
Charles Evans were construed in that context.
“We know that technology is disruptive. It’s changing a number
of business models that used to be very successful, and you
have to wonder if certain economic actors can continue to
maintain their price margins, or if they are under threat from
additional competition,” Evans said according to Bloomberg. “And that could be an
undercurrent for holding back inflation.”
In its latest annual report Amazon lists its total number of
employees at 341,400. This includes both full-time and
part-time employees. For a company this size that number is low
but expected because Amazon does not have a significant
storefront presence like Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (WMT) which employs
2.3 million people worldwide.
Amazon also engages third party contractors/companies for tasks
like deliveries. Those people go door to door dropping off
Amazon packages but are not employees for the company. Does
that matter? Yes and no.
In a way, these are jobs that are that people are doing,
therefore, some credit could go to Amazon for job creation. On
the other hand hiring contractual workers helps the company
keep its costs in check. Amazon has in the past been sued by contingent workers claiming they
received less than minimum wage, meanwhile there were others
that criticized the company for harsh working conditions.
Another angle of the jobs conversation is how many jobs Amazon
is eliminating. Considering the company is hurting other
retailers, forcing them to shutter stores and cut back on
costs, any job gains at Amazon may not in fact mean anything.
Though the actual extent of job loss is hard to determine
according to research by the Institute of Local
Self-Reliance (ILSR), in 2015 Amazon’s impact on jobs in the
U.S. was a net loss estimated at 148,774 jobs. Another estimate by American Booksellers
Association (ABA) and Civic Economics pegged net job loss at
222,000 for 2015. This gap could increase further with
Amazon’s quest for innovation and technology to achieve
operational efficiency has people worried about elimination of
jobs. Those worries are not far-fetched considering that the
company is testing its Amazon Go store in Seattle.
Amazon’s logistics infrastructure doesn’t just help it ship to
consumers all across the globe, it also aids another group of
people: small businesses. Listing their products on Amazon
helps them increase their customer reach and the delivery
essentially becomes Amazon’s headache.
“More than 100,000 entrepreneurs achieved over $100,000 in
sales selling on Amazon in 2016,” the company said in a
press release earlier this year.
As small businesses thrive, it will lead to further job
creation and spending. Amazon says that 600,000 jobs were
created outside of the company as a result of the Amazon
Marketplace for small businesses and entrepreneurs.
The Tax Payer
Income Tax: Does Amazon pay tax? Yes. Is it a
lot? No. Principally, President Trump’s claim about Amazon not
paying any tax is wrong, however, a 2016 analysis by the New York Times and S&P
Global Market Intelligence reveals that from 2007 to 2015,
Amazon paid taxes at an average rate of 13%, nearly half of the
26.9% average for the S&P 500 companies. But it wasn’t
alone. Other tech giants like Facebook, Alphabet and Apple also
had an average tax rate significantly lower than the average.
Sales Tax: Not having a physical presence or
employees in certain states also saved Amazon sales tax. Sales
tax is a complicated subject with rates and rules varying
across states. The most simple explanation in this context is
that tax laws in many states need the physical presence of an
online retailer in the state in order to collect sales tax.
Therefore by not having its own warehouses or employees in
certain states, Amazon saved on tax.
This however, wasn’t a problem specific to Amazon as this
applied to any online retailer shipping goods across
stateliness. The National Conference of State Legislatures in
its most recent estimate pegs the 2015 tax revenue loss due
to this peculiarity at $25 billion. Amazon acknowledged this
issue in its annual reports, and over a period of time it
started collecting sales tax on all goods that were sold in or
delivered to states that have such a tax. Five states: Alaska,
Delaware, Oregon, New Hampshire and Montana do not impose a
The sales tax issue gets even more complicated when it pertains
to third party sellers.
Amazon is in the race to become the first trillion dollar
company by market cap. This year it hit many milestones
including crossing the $1,000 mark for its share price. A
recent jump in shares briefly crowned CEO Jeff Bezos, who owns
17% in the company, as the richest man in the world.
The run for Amazon shares has been phenomenal for many years.
The company made its stock market debut 20 years ago and $100
invested then would have turned close to a spectacular $63,000.
If You Had Invested Right After Amazon’s IPO.)
In the past 10 years, the stock has given a whopping 1180%
return, as of August 17, 2017, while the 5 year return was
nearly 300%. The S&P 500 meanwhile returned only 68% over
the 10 year period. Imagine the wealth that was created by
Amazon’s stock return and the potential economic activities it
could finance in the future.
Amazon isn’t just a bumper investment for those who go in at
the right time, it is a big investor itself. As of 2016
year-end, the company held a portfolio of $19.6 billion in cash
equivalents and marketable debt securities. It also had $467
million worth of equity investments or equity warrants in
public and private companies.